Empirical Data vs. Ideological Theory

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Empirical Data vs. Ideological Theory

Aisha Shezadi gives a talk in a Norwegian school

This essay below by our Norwegian correspondent The Observer describes the current political and cultural situation in Norway and other Western nations.

Empirical Data vs. Ideological Theory
By The Observer

No one has the ability to look into the future, and hence no one can accurately predict what it has in store for us. All we can do is to look at present and historic trends and draw upon lessons from the past. When we add all these factors together and look at them in a truthful manner, we gain a fairly good idea of what to expect. When undertaking research projects, which in a way is almost like gazing into the future, there is only one method that we can rely upon, and that is a strict scientific approach which focuses solely on well-established ethical principles and whose ultimate goal is to uncover the truth unaffected by any other considerations.

Unfortunately, there are some who choose to employ unethical research methods in which ideological considerations are permitted to influence the outcome. Needless to say, this is a futile method which can only produce incorrect conclusions. The consequences of relying upon incorrect findings will in most fields of expertise result in undesired outcomes. In medicine, for instance, the act of prescribing incorrect medication or employing incorrect surgical methods can lead to devastating consequences and, in worst case scenarios, death. In engineering, erroneous calculations can result in serious accidents and potential catastrophic structural and mechanical failures.

The only way of judging any research is to subject it to critical analysis, which of course is an integral part of science. This means that anyone attempting to predict possible future scenarios will have to subject his or her thesis to critical scrutiny in order to determine its probability. It goes without saying that the more known factors the researchers can rely upon, the more accurate their conclusions are likely to be. The odds of reaching a meaningful outcome are a lot higher if the known factors comprise 90 percent and the unknowns 10 percent. And this is why it is essential to amass as much knowledge as possible before attempting to present a meaningful conclusion. Read the rest on:

The burden which Habakuk HaNavi (the prophet) did see.

Hab 1:2 Until when, Yahweh, must I cry for help, and Thou wilt not hear? Even cry out unto Thee, Chamas (violence!), and Thou wilt not save?

Hab 1:3 Why dost Thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold trouble? For plundering and chamas (violence) are before me; and there are those that raise up strife and contention.

Hab 1:4 Therefore the torah is not followed, and mishpat (ordinance) doth never prevail; for the rasha (bat one) doth hem in the tzadik; therefore mishpat (justice) proceeded perverted.

Hab 1:5 [Yahweh says:] Behold ye the Goyim (peoples), and regard, and wonder marvelously; for I will work a work in your yamim (days) which, though it be told you, of it ye will have no emunah (faith).

Hab 1:6 For, hineni (behold), I raise up the Kasdim (Chaldeans), that Goy (people) bitter and impetuous, which shall march far and wide over the earth, to confiscate the mishkanot (dwelling places) that are not their own.

Hab 1:7 They are terrible and dreadful; their mishpat (justice) and their dignity shall proceed from themselves.

Hab 1:8 Their susim (horses) also are swifter than the leopards, keener than the evening wolves; and their parash (horseman) shall charge ahead, and their parash (horseman) shall come from afar; they shall fly as the nesher (eagle), swooping to devour.

Hab 1:9 They shall come all for chamas (violence); the swarm of their faces is directed forward, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.

Hab 1:10 And they shall scoff at the melachim (kings), and the roznim (princes) shall be a scorn unto them; they shall laugh at every stronghold; for they shall heap dirt, and take it.

Hab 1:11 Then they sweep on like the ruach (wind), guilty men whose elohim is his own koach (power).

Hab 1:12 Art thou not mikedem (from everlasting),

[ Also said of Moshiach, indicating Moshiach’s divine nature: see Mic 5:2 [5:1] But thou, Beitlechem Ephratah, though thou be little among the Alphei Yehudah (Thousands of Yehudah), yet out of thee shall He [Moshiach] come forth unto Me [Yahweh] that is to be Moshel (governor) Yisroel; whose goings forth have been mikedem, (from everlasting), mimei olam (from the days of eternity).

Dan 7:13 I was beholding in visions of the night, and, hinei, one like a Bar Enosh (Ben Adam, i.e., Moshiach) came with the clouds of Shomayim, and came to the Atik Yomin (Ancient of Days, i.e., Yahweh), and before Him He was brought.

Dan 7:14 And there was given Him (Moshiach) dominion, and honor, and sovereignty, that all people, Goyim, tongues, should pey-lammed-chet. [i](worship as deity) (see Dan 3:12, serve, reverence as deity Him (Moshiach). His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and His (Messianic) Kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.],

Yahweh Elohai (my Elohim) Kedoshi (my Holy One)? We shall not die. Yahweh, Thou hast appointed them (these Chaldean) for mishpat (justice); O Tzur, Thou hast ordained them (these Chaldean) for reproof.

To say No to the mark of the beast is to say:
(And not to hate them!)

No too two states in the Land. Not to give a big part to these 'Chaldean'.
The world shall pay a big 'prize' for that! Receive judgment!
No too all the laws that goes against the commandments of Abba YHWH. No choice than to say No to Shariah law.

Not to look to the other side or to say, it’s Peace, when they try to put shariah law in your country.

But to say Yes to Abba Yahweh and His Laws special in this time when Abba Yahweh is 'testing' us:

Hab 1:12 Art thou not mikedem (‘everlasting’ also said of Moshiach, indicating Moshiach’s eternal divine nature: Dan 7:14 And there was given Him (Moshiach) dominion, and honor, and sovereignty, that all people, Goyim, tongues, should pey-lammed-chet. [ii](worship as deity) (see Dan 3:12, serve, reverence as deity Him (Moshiach). His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and His (Messianic) Kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.]see Michoh 5:1[2]; Yahweh Elohai (my Elohim) Kedoshi (my Holy One)? We shall not die. Yahweh, Thou hast appointed them (these Chaldean) for mishpat (ordinance); O Tzur, Thou hast ordained them (these Chaldean) for reproof.

Please take it serious what Abba Yahweh is telling us in:

Deu 18:15 Yahweh Eloheicha (your Elohim) will raise up unto thee a Navi (prophet) from among thee, of thy achim (bretheren), kamoni (like me [Moshe, Ex 32:30]); unto him ye must listen;

Deu 18:16 According to all that thou desired of Yahweh Eloheicha (your Elohimin) Chorev in the Yom HaKahal (day of the congregation), saying, Let me not hear again the voice of Yahweh Elohav (your Elohim), neither let me see this eish hagedolah (‘great fire’) any more, that I die not.

Deu 18:17 And Yahweh said unto me, They have well-spoken that which they have spoken.

Deu 18:18 I will raise them up a Navi (prophet) from among their achim (brethren), like unto thee, and will put My words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him [Yn 10:18].

Deu 18:19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not listen unto My words which he shall speak Bishmi (in My Name), I will require it of him.

Joh 8:28 Therefore, Rebbe, Melech HaMoshiach said to them, When you perform the hagbah (lifting up) of the Ben HaAdam, you will have da'as (knowledge) that Ani Hu [YESHAYAH 41:4; SHEMOT 3:14-16], and from myself I do nothing, but as HaAv (the Father) of me taught me, these things I speak.

[i] Dictionary of the Talmud. M. Jastrow p. 1178 פלח